Pig Sector: BMPA Pork Supply Chain Report

British Meat Processors Association
British Meat Processors Association
Vegetarian counter in a shop

How should the meat industry respond to the anti-meat debate?

The following article was written by Nick Allen, Chief Executive Officer at the British Meat Processors Association and appeared in the March edition of Meat Management magazine. It is reproduced here with their permission

Meat eating is under attack almost on a daily basis on the grounds of either health and nutrition, environmental impact or animal welfare. Many of these criticisms are inaccurate or misinformed and often lack evidence to back them up. However, they get media coverage because encouraging a vegetarian diet and criticising meat eating are very much in fashion at the moment. Significantly, the dominant reason for the crucial under 25 age group turning against meat is the environmental argument.

In their enthusiasm to jump onto the bandwagon of criticism, people often conflate the separate issues of whereand howmeat is produced in order to enhance their commentary. The result is that a lot of the information put out about meat eating and the impact of meat production on the environment is incredibly confusing to the person on the street.

Much of the evidence quoted to argue meat’s environmental impact comes from studies of overseas food production systems that are very different to how we rear animals here in the UK.  There is a considerable difference between the feedlots of South America and our predominantly grass-fed system. And yet it is often these overseas figures that are used to criticise our local production.

How the industry tackles these threats needs considerable thought and coordination, which, unfortunately, is not there at the moment.

How the industry tackles these threats needs considerable thought and coordination, which, unfortunately, is not there at the moment. We cannot as an industry just keep claiming that our critics are ‘talking nonsense’ and react to these challenges and issues in a piecemeal fashion. It’s also becoming clear that just extolling the dietary virtues of meat is not going to stem the tide of sentiment when most people’s objections are founded on a combination of the three factors of health, environment and animal rights.

We should be positioning Britain as the go-to source of the World’s highest welfare and most environmentally sustainable meat and differentiating our product in the minds of the World’s consumers.

Part of the solution will be to build a body of clear, accurate evidence from both sides of the debate; but we must also accept that some of the criticism is justified and demonstrate that we are prepared to change where logic and evidence suggest a better path. We may also have to accept that, rather than just fight, the industry may need to evolve (something we can already see happening at some meat companies both large and small). At the moment it feels as though the industry is burying its head in the sand and hoping it will weather the storm rather than working together to develop a coordinated approach.

The obvious organisation to lead the fightback is the AHDB, who collect over £25 million a year in meat levies alone. They also have the funding, expertise and resources to gather solid evidence and develop positive stories around meat eating. But we need them to recognise and acknowledge that this is a key priority for the industry, and in turn channel the right funds and activities to make it happen.

With a carefully planned approach and messaging, AHDB could be key to helping the UK maintain a viable livestock industry and one that produces meat in a sustainable way. It would also provide a clear message that when it comes to the environmental impact of eating meat, the country that produces it makes all the difference.

Nick Allen, CEO British Meat Processors Association

About Nick Allen

Nick is CEO of the British Meat Processors Association (BMPA) which is the leading trade association in the meat and meat product industry.

Latest

Why Suella Braverman’s remedy for the labour crisis won’t work

In an ideal world there would, as the Home Secretary...

Pigs on a farm

BMPA report says Defra’s pork supply chain consultation needs to look wider

BMPA's members sit at the centre of the British meat...

BMPA - Trade body of the year 2022

BMPA wins Best Trade Association two years in a row

BMPA has won Best Trade Association for the second year...

CO2 gas bottles

Situation with Co2 supplies set to deteriorate markedly

This week the security of UK Co2 supplies to critical...

The government has listened to meat industry warnings and pushed this plan back 12 months — more reality in face of post-#brexit regulatory enforcement capacity constraints.

https://britishmeatindustry.org/updates/defra-agree-to-move-new-rule-deadline-by-one-year/ https://twitter.com/pmdfoster/status/1587000818875744264

Huge relief that Defra has agreed to postpone new export rules by one year.
But there's still work to be done, and BMPA is looking forward to working with them to help devise a new system that's going to be needed to implement the new rules successfully.
👉https://bit.ly/3tFPt1j

This leaked letter from George Eustice comes as no surprise. But what else are we currently capitulating on?

Our warnings about the Oz trade deal went unheeded
👉https://bit.ly/3Uzfawc

Other countries have sector experts inside the tent during negotiations.....The UK doesn't.