British Meat Processors Association
British Meat Processors Association

‘No-deal’ Brexit could mean huge cost to scrap current pre-printed packaging

In the event of a ‘no-deal’ Brexit, UK meat exporters will not be entitled to use any abbreviation in the health and identification marks that implies membership of the EU. Even if you don’t export, you will only be able to use the old marks for a limited period of time after we leave the EU, although more clarity on exactly what that means is urgently needed to allow firms to plan packaging re-designs and production runs.

This will mean that some companies will be facing a considerable cost to replace current packaging with stock that bears the new mark. In some cases, manufacturers have several months supply of pre-printed packaging (potentially worth up to £1 million for some companies), which will have to be scrapped. The cost of re-packaging could also weigh heavily on some manufacturers.

FSA is working to ensure that companies will be equipped with new health marks for use after 29 March 2019. Following a short consultation period, we understand that the agency will communicate what changes will need to be made to the marks some time in November 2018.

About BMPA

The British Meat Processors Association (BMPA) is the leading trade association for the meat and meat products industry in the UK.

Topics

Latest

Union Jack flag behind a wire fence

Protecting a fragile trade by protecting standards

A key objective of Brexit is to pursue an independent...

Boxes ready for delivery

British firms don’t currently export to Europe, they simply deliver

The UK has been working under a fundamental illusion for...

Sausages in plastic containers

Unwrapping the Plastic Packaging Debate

Despite a public outcry following Blue Planet 2 in 2017,...

Nick Allen and Tom Kirwan giving evidence at the EFRA Committee

EFRA Committee challenges industry on beef prices

Last week’s EFRA Committee meeting provided a good opportunity to...

On first reading of the Ag Bill it's hard to see that the balance is correct; food production does not seem to have an equal priority.
As a policy it will fail if it delivers on the environment but then leaves the UK dependant on importing more food from other parts of the world

A cautionary article about the unintended consequences of our lifestyle choices. If we want to tackle climate change, we need to be armed with the facts first. We're presenting them at Rethink on 17 March. https://rethinkforums.org/

An example of how some journalists/activists work. Anna quotes George Monbiot as saying: 'It’s an idealised position. I know we won’t get things to change as far as that...I then make it easier for others to find the political space in which change can take place'. Common ground?